In a recent appearance on Bartoli Time, celebrated judoka Teddy Riner shared his thoughts on the ongoing debate surrounding the wearing of the veil in sports. His perspective? The discussion is not only unnecessary but distracting from more important issues.
Table of Contents
A Call to Focus on More Important Matters
Teddy Riner, a five-time Olympic judo champion, made it clear that he believes the focus should not be on the veil in sports. He argued that the debate is taking away time and attention from more pressing matters. “We’re wasting our time,” Riner stated on Sunday during the Bartoli Time show on RMC. “If we look at other cultures, other countries, things are going smoothly, and nobody is bothered by it.”
Riner’s frustration was palpable as he elaborated on the situation in France. “Here, in France, we’re spending so much energy on issues that don’t matter, while ignoring more significant challenges. We should focus on promoting equality rather than fixating on a single religion.”
This comment comes amidst a heated national discussion, with government officials divided on the issue. Riner’s perspective echoes a desire for a more balanced and inclusive approach, where the focus is on shared values like equality and mutual respect.

The Government’s Divided Stance
In recent weeks, the debate over the wearing of the veil in sports has intensified, with various government members voicing differing opinions. One of the most vocal critics of allowing religious symbols, including the veil, in sports is Bruno Retailleau, France’s Minister of the Interior. Retailleau has made it clear that he believes there should be no place for religious symbols in the sporting world Riner.
On March 15, Retailleau sharply criticized Marie Barsacq, the Minister of Sports, for her stance on the issue. Retailleau reminded her that the French Senate had already voted in favor of a law banning religious symbols in sports, a proposal supported by the government at the time. He emphasized that the government’s position remains firm, stating, “Fundamentalism has no place in sports.”
However, the Minister of Sports, Marie Barsacq, sees the issue differently. She has expressed concerns about equating the wearing of the veil with a broader issue of radicalization in the sporting world. She firmly believes that the veil is not an act of extremism but rather an expression of personal choice, and she cautioned against conflating the two issues. “The veil is not a form of entrenchment, and we must make a clear distinction between radicalization and personal religious expression,” Barsacq stated.
A National Disagreement Over Religious Expression in Sports
The disagreement between Retailleau and Barsacq is just one example of the growing tension within the French government over the issue. Prime Minister François Bayrou recently intervened, calling for greater solidarity among ministers. During a breakfast meeting with government supporters at Matignon, Bayrou strongly condemned the internal criticism within his own cabinet, labeling it “unacceptable.”
Bayrou also took the opportunity to remind his ministers of the importance of unity. He expressed frustration with the ongoing disagreements and urged them to focus on finding common ground. “We need to address this issue with solidarity,” Bayrou said, underscoring the importance of maintaining a cohesive approach.

The Broader Impact of the Debate
At its core, the debate over the veil in sports raises larger questions about how society views religious freedom, personal choice, and the role of religion in public life. For many, the veil is not just a piece of clothing but a symbol of identity, culture, and faith. The argument often centers on whether such expressions of personal belief should be allowed in spaces traditionally associated with secularism, such as sports.
Riner’s stance, however, is one that encourages moving beyond these divisive discussions and focusing on building a more inclusive society. According to him, France should spend less time debating the veil and more time addressing the social and political inequalities that persist Riner.
His comments reflect a larger conversation about the place of religion in public spaces, and the importance of respecting individuals’ choices while ensuring that all citizens are treated equally. In a multicultural society like France, these conversations are bound to continue, but the hope is that they lead to greater understanding rather than division.
The Path Forward
As the debate unfolds, it’s clear that there is no simple solution. The veil in sports debate taps into deep-rooted issues of national identity, secularism, and religious freedom. However, figures like Teddy Riner are pushing for a more open and thoughtful dialogue, one that prioritizes shared values over division.
In the coming months, it remains to be seen how the French government will navigate these challenging waters. Will they continue to focus on this contentious issue, or will they shift their attention to broader, more pressing concerns? One thing is certain: the debate is far from over.

Conclusion
Teddy Riner’s comments remind us that sometimes, focusing on the small details distracts from the larger issues that truly matter. As the conversation about the veil in sports continues to make headlines, it’s important to remember that true progress lies in promoting equality, mutual respect, and inclusivity—values that can unite us, rather than divide us.
In the end, Riner’s perspective calls for us to question whether we are focusing on the right things and whether the energy spent on divisive topics like the veil could be better used elsewhere—toward addressing the real challenges facing society today.
1 thought on “Teddy Riner Speaks Out on the Debate Over Wearing the Veil in Sports: ‘We’re Wasting Our Time’ best 2025”